In the traumatic aftermath of World War One, many questioned whether man's civilization had revealed a dooming weakness, and if one of its greatest achievements—democracy—was only a fragile ideal. Did the war to make the world "safe for democracy" expose a world unfit for democracy? And what about America? For 130 years the republic had survived chronic growing pains and a murderous civil war, but was it, too, displaying signs of dissolution and rot? Voter apathy, corruption in city politics, the "tyranny of the fifty-one percent," the suppression of black voting in the South—American democracy seemed worn, cracked, and vulnerable.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
Advocacy is often seen as working “within the system” where as activism is seen as working “outside the system” to generate change.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Saul, Hebrew Shaʾul, (flourished 11th century bc, Israel), first king of Israel. According to the biblical account found mainly in I Samuel, Saul was chosen king both by the judge Samuel and by public acclamation.
The correct answers are:
If Bulgaria attacked Turkey, then Russia would come to Turkey’s aide and draw them into the war as an ally. - This was a way to preserve Turkey’s neutrality during the war.
Britain and the US would establish a second military front - In June1944 the second front was created and it took the pressure of the Red Army so they could make progress into Germany’s territory.
1. “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me".
2. teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
