Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
The Egyptians were very efficiently protected by their geographical surroundings; enemy armies would have had to travel long distances through deserts or via boat over oceans to enter Egypt.
Egypt was protected by the Mediterranean Sea to the North and the Red Sea to the East, with only a relatively small strip of land connecting Egypt and Africa with the Eurasian land. To the South was the Sahara Desert and to the West was what is no known as the Libyan Desert. Basically, from all directions, enemies would have had to overcome significant geographical borders to reach the Egyptians.
The appointment of executive agency heads, such as cabinet level secretaries, commissioners, directors and assistants, allows the Governor to set the direction of the administration. for example: secretary of finance, infrastructure, education, and others.
Answer:
i think its A because c and d are how they worked with the jews and christians but b just says how they practiced pillars if not a then b if not thoe two then i dont know.
Explanation:
