Answer:
sexual sadism
Explanation:
Sexual sadism: In abnormal psychology, the term sexual sadism is defined as a mental disorder in which an individual faces or experiences sexual arousal as a result of humiliation, suffering, or extreme pain of another person. It can involve other conditions and elicit pain. It can also be referred to as a form of paraphilia yet not harmful and do not fulfill the criteria of paraphilia disorder.
Treatment: Medication and psychotherapy including cognitive-behavioral therapy.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of sexual sadism.
Answer:
checks and balances
Explanation:
There are three distinct branches of the government and each have its own distinct purpose and functions. Even though the President of America has supreme powers in the country he does not enjoy ultimate power.
Even though the President of America voted for the bill that allowed of harsher sentences for the people working in the National Security Agency who discloses the confidential information to others, the Congress overruled the bill by a 2/3 majority.
Finally the bill was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Thus it is the function of the Supreme court to guard the constitution and the right of its citizens. The Supreme court checks and balances the rights provide to the citizens.
Thus the answer is checks and balances.
The House of Representatives must draw up and vote on Articles of Impeachment. The Articles will outline the charges, and a vote in favor will declare the President impeached. A vote against drops the charges.
Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
Answer: fairly high degree of commitment
Explanation: There are four levels of commitment. They are:
Distraction
Decision
Discipline
Devotion
A high level of commitment is really what is required to achieve major goals in life, and that brings us to the Commitment Scale.
Because Sam usually study hard, he has reached a high level of commitment through discipline and devotion. Definitely he will achieve his goal
