Answer:
a. big fish in a little pond
Explanation:
Coming soon
Answer:
Amida should share her limitations in the first section where she would describe the problem and setting.
Explanation:
Limitations are like shortcomings or influences that are not under the control of the researcher. These limitations restrict the method and conclusions of the research. So, while doing a research study, any limitation that might change or influence the result should be mentioned in the beginning where the problem (the research case study) is mentioned.
It is important to mention the limitation as reader would otherwise be wonder that if there are any conditions which might have influenced the research.
The answer: Coal, wool, diamonds
Using one or more actual engineering-related cases as well as some workable ethical theories, argue whether
or not the SECEPP is a coherent and comprehensive code of conduct for the computing/IT profession. In
the support for your argument, describe some virtues of the ethical codes of conduct adopted by professional
societies such as the ACM and IEEE-CS, and list some shortcomings of these professional codes as well. In
your final analysis, discuss whether the advantages of having a code outweigh the prospects of not having
one.
General Guidelines
• Note: Your thesis must be argued using at least one of the “workable” ethical theories that have been
covered in readings/lecture. However, unlike recitations, feel free to draw in more than one ethical
theory if it will help you defend your thesis in a clear manner.
• Paper Length: 1,000 – 1,500 words or longer (not including front matter or references)
• Reference/Citation Format: Consistently use one of MLA, APA, or Chicago/Turabian.
• Rubric: The grading rubric for this assignment is contained on the next page.
Submission Instructions
A PDF version of your paper must be submitted before the due date and time via eLC. There will be an
assignment dropbox available for the sub
