Mexico has been heavily influenced by Spanish and American cultures for quite some time now like:while during the conquest of Mexico by the Spanish,they had introduced the Roman Catholic faith and the western education and many Mexican customs and tradition such as mariachi and festivals were part of Spain’s own influences. During the Mexican-American War, true the US won and acquired territory’s from Mexico, so many Mexicans became citizens of the United States and brought their own cultures to America such like their food,their festivities and actual better education as well also some opportunity’s in business and careers, too. So we and the Spanish helped shape Mexico’s culture but while doing so they changed us as well America would be much different if not for them and probably it’s the same for Spain.
The reason that was not adduced in the text as contributing to the increase in incarceration rates of drug offenders is: additional prosecution penalties for drug activity related to organized crime groups
<h3 /><h3>What was the point of the text?</h3>
In the text that addresses the topic, "Drugs, Health, and Society," the author noted several points that were responsible for the increase in the imprisonment rates of drug offenders.
Several reasons were given to explain this rising phenomenon. Of these, additional prosecution penalties that arose from organized crime groups were not stated.
Learn more about drugs and society here:
brainly.com/question/21174320
That statement is true
The goal must be specific in order for us to objectively measure whether we manage to achieve that goal or not.
The goal must be difficult in order to ensure our growth/development.
The goal must be participatory set in order ensure that we personally desire the goals/changes to happen, not anyone else.
I believe it is an involuntary bailment.
Answer:
adversarial system
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the system being described is known as the adversarial system. Like mentioned in the question this is a legal system in which two individuals represent their own parties' case in front of an impartial group of peers who will then analyze all the information and come to a conclusion in favor of one of the two parties.