All categories

3 years ago

According to the hypothesis tested by elmore and oyserman (2011), what message was expected to improve boys' school performance?

1 answer:

8 0

<span>According to the hypothesis tested by Elmore and Oyserman, communicating the idea that "when we (referring to the students' gender-identity) succeed, then I succeed" would improve boys' school performance. The researchers discovered that the beliefs held by boys with regard to studies and overall academic performance tended to denigrate boys as a whole. This belief system became self-fulfilling on standardized testing. The researchers chose a group of lower-income students and asked the students how they saw themselves in the future. They also provided them with information such as "Men generally earn more than women," graphs and statistics comparing the median income of high school dropouts with that of high school graduates and college graduates, etc. The idea was to allow the students to associate themselves with those described in the statistical data. The results showed that students saw more school-focused future identities when success is presented as a characteristic of their own gender.</span>

You might be interested in

Plum Corporation began the month of May with $1,400,000 of current assets, a current ratio of 1.90:1, and an acid-test ratio of

matrenka [14]

Answer:

Plum Corporation

(1) current ratio = Current assets/current liabilities

(2) acid-test ratio = (Current asset -Inventory)/Current liabilities

(3) working capital = Current assets minus Current liabilities

(4) acid-test assets = quick assets

May 2 Purchased $75,000 of merchandise inventory on credit.

Current Assets: $1,400,000 + $75,000 = $1,475,000

Current Liabilities: $737,000 + $75,000 = $812,000

Inventory: $147,000 +$75,000 = $222,000

(1) current ratio = $1,475,000/$812,000

= 1.82:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,475,000 - $222,000/$812,000

= 1.54:1

(3) working capital = Current Assets - Current Liabilities

= $1,475,000 - $812,000

= $663,000

May 8 Sold merchandise inventory that cost $55,000 for $150,000 cash.

Current Assets: $1,475,000 -55,000 + 150,000 = $1,570,000

Current Liabilities: $812,000

Inventory: $222,000 - 55,000 = $167,000

Quick Assets = $1,570,000 - 167,000 = $1,403,000

(1) current ratio = $1,570,000/$812,000

= 1.93

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,403,000/$812,000

= 1.73

(3) working capital = $1,570,000 - $812,000

= $758,000

May 10 Collected $26,000 cash on an account receivable.

Current Assets: $1,570,000 ($26,000 - $26,000) = $1,570,000

Current Liabilities: $812,000

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,570,000 - 167,000 = $1,403,000

(1) current ratio = $1,570,000/$812,000

= 1.93

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,403,000/$812,000

= 1.73

(3) working capital = $1,570,000 - $812,000

= $758,000

May 15 Paid $29,500 cash to settle an account payable.

Current Assets: $1,570,000 - $29,500 = $1,540,500

Current Liabilities: $812,000 - $29,500 = $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,540,500 - 167,000 = $1,373,500

(1) current ratio = $1,540,500/$782,500

= 1.97:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,373,500/$782,500

= 1.76:1

(3) working capital = $1,540,500 - $782,500

= $758,000

May 17 Wrote off a $5,000 bad debt against the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account.

Current Assets: $1,540,500 - $5,000 = $1,535,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,535,500 - 167,000 = $1,368,500

(1) current ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= 1.96:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= $1.96:1

(3) working capital = $1,535,500 - $782,500

=$753,000

May 22 Declared a $1 per share cash dividend on its 69,000 shares of outstanding common stock.

Current Assets: $1,535,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,535,500 - 167,000 = $1,368,500

(1) current ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= 1.96:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= $1.96:1

(3) working capital = $1,535,500 - $782,500

=$753,000

May 26 Paid the dividend declared on May 22.

Current Assets: $1,535,500 -$69,000 = $1,466,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,466,500 - 167,000 = $1,299,500

(1) current ratio = $1,466,500/$782,500

= 1.87:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,299,500/$782,500

= 1.66:1

(3) working capital = $1,466,500 - $782,500

= $684,000

May 27 Borrowed $120,000 cash by giving the bank a 30-day, 10% note.

Current Assets: $1,466,500 + $120,000 = $1,586,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500 + $120,000 = $902,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,586,500 - 167,000 = $1,419,500

(1) current ratio = $1,586,500/$902,500

= 1.76

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,419,500/$902,500

= 1.57

(3) working capital = $1,586,500 - $902,500

= $684,000

May 28 Borrowed $135,000 cash by signing a long-term secured note.

Current Assets: $1,586,500 + $135,000= $1,721,500

Current Liabilities: $902,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,721,500 - 167,000 = $1,554,500

(1) current ratio = $1,721,500/$902,500

= 1.91:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,554,500/$902,500

= 1.72

(3) working capital = $1,721,500 - $902,500

= $819,000

May 29 Used the $255,000 cash proceeds from the notes to buy new machinery.

Current Assets: $1,721,500 - $255,000 = $1,466,500

Current Liabilities: $902,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,466,500 - 167,000 = $1,299,500

(1) current ratio = $1,466,500/$902,500

= 1.62:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,299,500/$902,500

= 1.44:1

(3) working capital = $1,466,500 - $902,500

= $564,000

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

May 1, Current Assets = $1,400,000

Ratio of current assets to current liabilities = 1.90:1

Acid -test ratio = 1.70:1

Therefore, current liabilities = $1,400,000/1.9 = $737,000

Current Assets minus Inventory/$737,000 = 1.7

Therefore, current assets minus inventory = $737,000 * 1.7 = 1,253,000

Inventory = Current Assets - (Current assets -inventory)

= $1,400,000 - $1,253,000

= $147,000

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

10 points pls help You should share a copy of your résumé with the following ______.

Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

employer or you family buts thats it hahah

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Fogelberg Company purchased equipment for $12,000. Sales tax on the purchase was $600. Other costs incurred were freight charges

Step2247 [10]

Answer : The correct option is, (d) $13,110.00

Explanation : Given,

Price when company purchased equipment = $12000

Sales tax price = $600

Freight charges = $240

Damage charges = $420

Installation costs = $270

Now we have to determine the total cost of the equipment.

Total cost of the equipment = Purchased price + Sales tax price + Freight charges + Installation costs

Total cost of the equipment = $12000 + $600 + $240 + $270

Total cost of the equipment = $13110.00

Thus, the total cost of the equipment is, $13110.00

5 0

3 years ago

Employed by an inner-city development council, Beth Maxwell works with a steering committee to guide members in identifying prio

Brrunno [24]

Answer:

Facilitator role

Explanation:

A facilitator is an individual who is in charge in helping a group of people to understand their various objectives and also to help to plan to achieve them without taking a specific stand in the discussion.

A facilitator makes sure that outcomes, actions and questions are properly taken down and actioned, and effectively handled afterwards.

A facilitator employs various skills, tools, exercises and natural abilities to keep a group discussion moving in the right direction.

7 0

3 years ago

Redbud Company uses a certain part in its manufacturing process that it buys from an outside supplier for $44 per part plus anot

Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

Redbud Company

A) Relevant costs:

B) Direct labor

C) Direct material

D) Variable overhead

F) New manager's salary

B) B) Redbud is indifferent about the decision.

C. Other factors to consider:

B) The potential for improved control over the availability of the parts by having it when needed and the potential for improved quality of the parts.

C) Since Redbud Company is considering the use of currently available capacity, it should evaluate any relevant opportunity costs of using this capacity for more profitable activities.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Cost of buying parts from outside supplier = $50 per part

Units required in the next year = 10,000

Costs required to produce internally:

Supervisor's salaries $40,000

Direct material $ 28

Direct labor 12

Variable overhead 6

Fixed overhead (includes

manager at $4 per unit) 10

Total unit cost $ 56

Relevant costs:

Direct material $ 28

Direct labor 12

Variable overhead 6

Fixed overhead (includes

manager at $4 per unit) 4

Total unit cost $50

6 0

3 years ago