Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
<3hsberrExplanation:
frrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrffrffff
Answer:
C. Anger over the french government denouncing the catholic church.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
It is the process in which companies record and report the pieces of financial data that go in and out of its business operations that allow both company managers and outside investors and analysts to understand the company's health and make informed decisions.
It provides investors with a baseline of analysis for—and comparison between—the financial health of securities-issuing corporations.
It helps creditors assess the solvency, liquidity, and creditworthiness of businesses.
Along with its cousin, managerial accounting, it helps businesses make decisions about how to allocate scarce resources.
Males are most likely to be ronbef
