Answer:
If the soil/ground is good for crops they'll adpat to start growing crops,
if they have a river near by humans' or "settlers" Can use the river/water to not die dehydration and possibly catch fish which is another food soruce, and the animals in their area, say deer's and birds of some sorts, they can hunt and survive by their meats
Explanation:
Townshend acts would be my est answer.
The abolitionist newspaper "The liberator" looked at slavery from the point of view slaves.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The abolitionist newspaper The liberator was publishes by William Llyod Garrison from Boston and he is known to be one of the radical abolitionists and demanded immediate emancipation of all the slaves.The newspaper denounced Kansas-Nebraska Act and denounced the compromise of 1850.
"The liberator"looked at slavery from the point of view of a slave and fought for their liberation and challenged the position of slave owners in the south.
Answer:
hi how are you
The Missouri River would have flowed north across Canada. There would be no Hudson’s Bay. The Ohio River would not exist. Instead the “New” River of West Virginia would have flowed north to the St. Lawrence. There would be no Great Lakes.
The British colonies would have remained hemmed in along the Atlantic. There would be no easy access to the Mississippi and the interior might well have remained solidly French. If you did somehow get to the Mississippi, there would be no Missouri River to take you to the Rocky Mountains. There would be no Detroit, Chicago or Milwaukee.
you meant something like that?