Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
Assuming you are hoping to obtain the value of "g", to solve worded algebra problems like these, it is easier to translate the world problem into a mathematical equation first.
In this case, "93 is the sum of a number g and 58" can be translated to:
93 = g + 58
To find the value of g, it is necessary to isolate g first. To do this, we subtract both sides of the equation by 58:
93 - 58 = g + 58 - 58
93 - 58 = g
Simplifying:
g = 35
10000:100*11=1100 income per year
21000-10000=11000 need to have income
11000:1100=10 years will pass time
Answer:
8.6m
Step-by-step explanation:
mark me as the brainliest
B is the answer hope I help
