Answer:
All political canidates come from one party
Explanation:
Hey there!
<u>Understanding what the question is asking:</u>
We understand that the question is asking about that we would have to right or propose a new amendment for the Constitution that would describe or establish a critical 'right' that would not be currently protected by the document, which is the 'bill of rights'. And then, after analyzing this, we would have to consider why this is not being protected. Let's get started!
<u>Answer:</u>
The first amendment that was not protect, was the following: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” 
answer.
<u>How?</u>
The reason why this is not protected is because the congress believed that protecting a law the is just a freedom of speech would not need to be protected. Which, in the case, I agree with this also.
But, just because the government can not a make a law about this, they can still handle consequence within court about this.
Answer:
Facilitate their interaction.
Explanation:
An effective group leader posses variety of traits and qualities which make the group members to follow him and his commands but as per my opinion, a group leader must posses the quality of " clear communication" whether it is verbal or written so that he can convey his messages to the team members more efficiently. In this case Group leader should facilitate the interaction between Beth and Nicole and assess the impact of conflict on the other members of the group. This will also let the members know that their group leader respect their opinions and also understand their issues and problems.
Answer:
The war could not have been avoided because of the determination of the Confederacy.They wanted to be considered as an independent nation and therefore the only way that they could have withdrawn from the Union was through a war because the North would not have allowed them to come out of the Union easily.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
Answer:
Informed consent and anonymity
Explanation:
This researcher has violated the anonymous and informed consent clause. Informed consent has to do with participants knowing the reasons for the informations they provide before they give it out. This researcher was not honest with the students because what he told them he needed the emails for was different from what he ended up using them for. He breached the anonymous clause and the privacy of the students by doing this.
