<span>When personal values and corporate values are aligned, employees have more
confidence. An example would be salary. </span>The most important factor in the
work process or industry is to retain the interest of the employee. And to
retain them, their salary or profit must be adjusted to the best value. Unless
the employee does not do his job properly, employees must receive bonuses or
benefits to ensure them to stay in the company. It will actually make them stay
longer, make them feel important and reduce costs for hiring new employees. Making feel the employees confident will bring the company into good hands especially if the work that the employee is doing covers all the necessity they need.
<span> </span>
Answer:
The answer is "Feel badly about herself but be motivated to play well".
Explanation:
The social contrast happens when they compete with those who they think are more important than all of us these upward correlations are often pointed at improving the present position or level of capacity. This can compare ourselves better with someone and find means of attaining similar outcomes referring to others, who are worse off than themselves, in downward prosocial behavior. These downwards correlations also focus on making our skills or traits feel good. For the analysis, it has been determined the upward comparisons appear and to make us feel better, whereas the upward social influence appears to drive us even more or greater.
Answer:
Health insurance.
Car insurance.
Life insurance.
Homeowners insurance.
Renters insurance.
Pet insurance.
etc..
Explanation:
I dont rlly know if this is what you meant.. So, I'm just hoping it is. :)
Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.
