Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
Would be, a white family with 2 kids in a medium size home with a dog and a cat both parents are working 9-5 and kids are going to middle school...
Second common would be, A black family overweight dad construction and mom a clinic nurse with 6 kids and a bulldog...
Third would be, Mexican family with 10 kids and over 100 relatives in a large white van, the dad is working on the field and the mom is a stay at home mom looking over the small kids teaching them Spanish and english. (also for fun they go to the water park with the entire family)
It’s the first one I believe if not its the third one
