Answer:
x = 56
Step-by-step explanation:
x + 59 + 65 = 180
x + 124 = 180
x = 56
Common factors -10/15 -9/15
Subtract -19/15
Your answer is -19/15
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
Number of dimes = 28
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Worth of coins = $6.30 = 6.30 * 100 = 630 cents
Let,
x be the number of dimes
y be the number of quarters
According to given statement;
x = 2y Eqn 1
10x+25y = 630 Eqn 2
Putting x = 2y in Eqn 2
10(2y) + 25y = 630
20y + 25y = 630
45y = 630
Dividing both sides by 45

Putting y=14 in Eqn 1
x = 2(14)
x = 28
Hence,
Number of dimes = 28