<h3>
Answer:</h3>
0.0463 mol KCl
<h3>
General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>
<u>Math</u>
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Chemistry</u>
<u>Atomic Structure</u>
- Reading a Periodic Table
- Using Dimensional Analysis
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
3.45 g KCl
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
Molar Mass of K - 39.10 g/mol
Molar Mass of Cl - 35.45 g/mol
Molar Mass of KCl - 39.10 + 35.45 = 74.55 g/mol
<u>Step 3: Convert</u>
- Set up:

- Multiply/Divide:

<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>Follow sig fig rules and round. We are given 3 sig figs.</em>
0.046278 mol KCl ≈ 0.0463 mol KCl
The half-life of polonium-210, given that it decays from 98.3 micrograms to 12.3 micrograms in 414 days is 138 days
<h3>How to determine the number of half-lives </h3>
- Original amount (N₀) = 98.3 micrograms
- Amount remaining (N) = 12.3 micrograms
- Number of half-lives (n) =?
2ⁿ = N₀ / N
2ⁿ = 98.3 / 12.3
2ⁿ = 8
2ⁿ = 2³
n = 3
<h3>How to determine the half life </h3>
- Number of half-lives (n) = 3
- Time (t) = 414 days
- Half-life (t½) = ?
t½ = t / n
t½ = 414 / 3
t½ = 138 days
Learn more about half life:
brainly.com/question/26374513
#SPJ1
A cookie made from flour, eggs, sugar, butter, and chocolate chips is an example of a heterogeneous mixture.
Also, mixing the sugar flavoring in water, since you're mixing two different states of matter.
The answer is b as they can occur in oceans creating heat
Answer:
- First choice: <em>The hypothesis is revised and another experiment is conducted. </em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
Citing myself from brainly.com/question/12687503, a hypothesis is a reasonable explanation of a phenomenon, which tries to relate a cause with an effect, and that can be testable.
The outcome of the test can either support the hypothesis or reject it.
Both results, either supporting or rejecting the hypothesis, are good for science and help to the development of the scientific knowledge.
Hence, the fact that the data from an experiment do not support the original hypothesis is not a bad thing. The same scientist or other from the scientific community will be able to revise the hypothesis and conduct another experiment, as the first answer choice proposes.
The data are supposed to be correct, unless the analysys, not the conclusion, suggests some errors in the measures or collection of the data. So, it is not the fact that the data do not support the original hypothesis what conducts to run the experiment again (second choice is wrong, then).
The revision of the data to support the hypothesis (third choice) or adjustment of the data to match the observations (fourth hypothesis) are contrary to good practices, so they are also discarded.