1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
8

What motivated Aung San Suu Kyi to strive for democratic rule in Burma?

History
1 answer:
Mariulka [41]3 years ago
3 0
I think it is because she grew up in such a different place and when she cme back she was shocked at the violence that the protesters were receiving
You might be interested in
The issue of religious toleration figured prominently in the founding of: *
Oxana [17]

Answer:

Georgia

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What items did the Chinese trade?​
maksim [4K]

Answer:

silk, the Chinese also exported (sold) teas, salt, sugar, porcelain, and spices. Most of what was traded was expensive luxury goods. This was because it was a long trip and merchants didn't have a lot of room for goods. They imported, or bought, goods like cotton, ivory, wool, gold, and silver.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
The absolute monarchy in France worked to prevent industrialization in France? True or false
Westkost [7]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Aral pan:alin sa mga sumusunod ang saklaw ng heograpiya​
alekssr [168]

Answer:

??? sorry cant help .........

8 0
3 years ago
The ruling in miranda v arizona most affected the procedure in which step of this process
chubhunter [2.5K]
The arrest of a criminal suspect.

If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it:  "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...."  There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.

Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966.  Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman.  He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights.  After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can anyone help me on my history homework
    6·1 answer
  • What was the 13th admendment? Was was passing it so important to president Lincoln?
    6·1 answer
  • Faced with famine, increased taxes, and rising discontent, Louis XVI called a meeting of the Estates-General. This was the first
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a cause of increased globalization? -the technology revolution -fair trade initiatives -lowered immig
    11·1 answer
  • What was the primary purpose of the German racial purity laws?
    14·2 answers
  • What leader found Hispaniola and the Caribbean
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP ILL GIVE BRAINILY TO WHOEVER ANSWERS THIS CORRECTLY
    8·1 answer
  • What was the counterculture, and what impact did it have on american society? t section 2 2. what led to the rise of the women's
    6·1 answer
  • Archduke Ferdinand was from Austria-Hungary and was assassinated by
    6·2 answers
  • What were the characteristics of trade between Rome and the East?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!