I Believe The Answer is B rice
<u>Answer:</u>
Libertarianism and utilitarianism are in opposition to one another. In utilitarianism, individuals accept that an activity that produces satisfaction is the thing that one ought to go. Utilitarians could not care less whether what they are doing occupies someone else's privileges. While, in libertarianism, an individual's activity for bliss ought not to disregard someone else's rights. Libertarians’ esteem activities that advance reasonableness and equity in the general public dissimilar to the practical actions that now and again damages decency and fairness.
No one, not even he could have averted the war without a historical wrong that could no longer be justified in a democracy - the continuation of legal human bondage in the United States. But to answer the question. Yes, I think it was very possible that no guns had to fire, and it would have been to me a revolting development.
They both explored north america manly canada
