Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Nutka1998 [239]

3 years ago

5

Ignore the top just answer both of the questions at the bottom plz

2 answers:

erastovalidia [21]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

y = 5x+2 , y=x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

just by looking at the table you can see for the first one 5x + 2 satisfies the table, and x-6 satisfies the right table.

dlinn [17]3 years ago

4 0

for the first table the equation is:

$x(5) + 2 = y$

and for the second it's:

$x - 6 = y$

You might be interested in

Warren owes $1,000 for a new laptop. He pays $100 each week.

lana [24]

Answer:

b) In 10 weeks, the loan is paid in full.

Step-by-step explanation:

10×$100=$1000

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

(Anderson, 1.14) Assume that P(A) = 0.4 and P(B) = 0.7. Making no further assumptions on A and B, show that P(A ∩ B) satisfies 0

Goshia [24]

Answer with Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

P(A)=0.4 and P(B)=0.7

We know that

$P(A)+P(B)+P(A\cap B)=P(A\cup B)$

We know that

Maximum value of $P(A\cup B)$ =1 and minimum value of $P(A\cup B)$ =0

$0\leq P(A\cup B )\leq 1$

$0\leq P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$0\leq 0.4+0.7-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$0\leq 1.1-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$0\leq 1.1-P(A\cap B)$

$P(A\cap B)\leq 1.1$

It is not possible that $P(A\cap B)$ is equal to 1.1

$1.1-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$-P(A\cap B)\leq 1-1.1=-0.1$

Multiply by (-1) on both sides

$P(A\cap B)\geq 0.1$

Again, $P(A\cup B)\geq P(B)$

$0.4+0.7-P(A\cap B)\geq 0.7$

$1.1-P(A\cap B)\geq 0.7$

$-P(A\cap B)\geq -1.1+0.7=-0.4$

Multiply by (-1) on both sides

$P(A\cap B)\leq 0.4$

Hence, $0.1\leq P(A\cap B)\leq 0.4$

3 0

3 years ago

Help ASAP with this question

Serjik [45]

I would say either a or b

3 0

3 years ago

Divide (5x + 6x^3 - 8) ÷(x - 2) PLEASE HELP DUE IN 5 MINUTES

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

6x^2+12x+29+50/x-2

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Since 2003 median home prices in Midvale, UT have been growing exponentially at roughly 4.7 % per year. If you had purchased a h

Kipish [7]

Answer:

The home would be worth $249000 during the year of 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

The price of the home in t years after 2004 can be modeled by the following equation:

$P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^{t}$

In which P(0) is the price of the house in 2004 and r is the growth rate.

Since 2003 median home prices in Midvale, UT have been growing exponentially at roughly 4.7 % per year.

This means that $r = 0.047$

$172000 in 2004

This means that $P(0) = 172000$

What year would the home be worth $ 249000 ?

t years after 2004.

t is found when P(t) = 249000. So

$P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^{t}$

$249000 = 172000(1.047)^{t}$

$(1.047)^{t} = \frac{249000}{172000}$

$\log{(1.047)^{t}} = \log{\frac{249000}{172000}}$

$t\log(1.047) = \log{\frac{249000}{172000}}$

$t = \frac{\log{\frac{249000}{172000}}}{\log(1.047)}$

$t = 8.05$

2004 + 8.05 = 2012

The home would be worth $249000 during the year of 2012.

8 0

3 years ago