It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
The answer is the pigment red
The Scientific method can help resolve problems logically.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A logical and systematic approach that is used for the discovery of working of things in the world is known as Science. The scientific methods are used by the scientists for the purpose of evidences that can be measured and associated with the assumed hypothesis. The result of this method will be either supporting or contradicting to the theory.
The term "science" refers to the knowledge whose base is from some reproducible data. The result is obtained through the process of analysis and testing. It aims in finding solutions to any problem through logic and research.
<span>Vertebrates and invertebrates</span>
