Answer:
Option (A) is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
If the hypothesis is correct then we shall be higher than Fst in the rest of the genome in the area environment the cold-shock protein in the genomic region surrounding the cold-shock gene, except for the Fst.
- Cold shock components are those product uses that are produced in cold and defend against cold stress. Fst is a gene of ice, present offshore of proteins from cold shock. During cold stress, the fist gene expression increase by several folds to increase cold shock protein production.
- Other options are incorrect because they are not related to the given scenario.
Answer:
There is a great difference between light and scanning electron microscope. The source of illumination is light rays in light microscope while in scanning electron microscope electrons are the source of illumination.
The resolving and magnification power of scanning electron microscope is much greater than that of a light microscope. The magnifying power of a light microscope is 1000X and of electron microscope is 10,00,000X.
In light microscope image is seen through the eyepiece while in scanning electron microscope it is seen on a fluorescent screen. Even small specimens up to 0.1 micrometers can be seen by scanning electron microscope which is not possible to see by light microscope.
I would say immigration only.
emigration would theoretically reduce the genetic variation as unique individuals leave, but immigration would bring unique traits into circulation in an ecosystem.
I'm not super great at biogy tho so this might not be right... :)
Answer:
C. Yes, the results of his experiment were probably inaccurate the
first time.
Answer:
Hypothesis If the type of the food available changes, then the frequency of beak types will change, because birds with beaks more suited to the available food will be more successful over time.
Explanation: