Pro: No need to debate about the dissions
Con: Those ideas that the leader chooses, the people may not approve
The answer is: Vincent Ogé
<span>Vincent Ogé was a mix-raced 'free man' who was wealthy and educated, a rarity at the time for someone from mixed ethnicity.
</span>
He made his money through plantation and was well traveled in Europe. On a trip to Paris, he saw the French revolution take place before his eyes.
However, he saw how the benefits of the revolution were only for the 'white people'.
With the help of the British he wanted to end slavery in <span>Saint-Domingue.
</span><span>
</span><span>
</span><span>He was eventually executed by the French and he became a symbol of the slave struggle. His death caused huge riots for days.</span>
The USS Maine exploded in Cuba’s Havana harbor. This ignited the war because the US believed that the Spaniards had something to do with it.
<span>One thing is competition. Competition has always been something that turns off the potential of the media. This is when many people compete for a higher status on the media.
Accusations is another. Accusations spread among founders.
Internet failure, otherwise known as the shortage of equipment on time is another that could limit the core functions.
</span>In result of the previous 3, employee's end working, or don't work as much. Participation and teamwork all count towards media.