Answer: property rights and obligations
Explanation:
The property rights and obligations are those theoretical and legal ownership for the resources. These resources can be tangible or intangible in nature. The property rights are owned by the individuals, government and the businesses.
The individuals can exercise their private property rights by accommodating in the property, hold, rent or sell the property. The property rights can be used for the purpose of market exchange, allocation of the rights of the property and society can affect the efficiency for the use of property resource.
The individuals and the organizations have the concerned rights for the purpose of intellectual property.
<u>Selective attention</u> is the cognitive process used by the flight cadets who were required to repeat certain digits.
<h3><u>What does "Selective Attention" mean?</u></h3>
One kind of attention is selective focus. It facilitates your ability to maintain sustained attention on a single task. We can only pay attention to things that are now important since our attention is finite in both capacity and duration. Simply put, we ignore or push the rest of the environment's elements into the background as we focus on particular aspects of it.
Our ability to traverse our environment at any given time is based on two main types of selective attention.
Learn more about the cognitive process with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/24978746
#SPJ4
Considering the description in the question above, the process that illustrates how Professor Tyler formulated her definition of authoritarianism is Conceptualization.
This is because Conceptualization is a term that describes the procedure of constructing or making a concept, notion, or meaning of certain words.
In this case, when Professor Tyler formulated her definition of authoritarianism, what she did was called conceptualization.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the process that illustrates what Professor Tyler did is Conceptualization.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/15321108
Answer:
through law
Explanation:
In order to solve a conflict between two groups, something need to be used as the 'mediator' between the two. This mediator needs to be impartial and had a set of pre-determined rules that can be used as a standard of 'right' or 'wrong'.
Almost every society that exist in the world right now established a judicial system in order to act as this mediator.
Both parties that are involved in a conflict are allowed to present their case to the judge. After hearing each of the presentation, the judge will checked how each of their position stand according to the law and determine who are in the 'right' and who are in the 'wrong'/
I know one, the Europeans generally exploited natives in every one of their colonies.
