1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
just olya [345]
2 years ago
12

Which of the following is NOT a difference between parliamentary debate and both the policy and Lincoln-Douglass debates? A. The

parliamentary debate allows for witty remarks. B. The parliamentary debate is the same as the Lincoln-Douglass debate style. C. The parliamentary debate allows for interruptions in the constructive phase of debate. D. The parliamentary debate combines the philosophical/practical approach of the policy debate with the ethical approach of the Lincoln-Douglass debate.
History
1 answer:
valkas [14]2 years ago
6 0
The that is  NOT a difference between parliamentary debate and both the policy and Lincoln-Douglass debates would be: <span>B. The parliamentary debate is the same as the Lincoln-Douglass debate style
The lincoln-douglass debate sytyle use one-versus-one format in the debate, meanwhile the Parliamentary debate style use two-versus-two format in the debate.</span>
You might be interested in
Which of the following characteristics was true of native-born Protestants?
lisabon 2012 [21]
B. They were the largest participants in the Great Migration.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the use of unrestricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic by Germany, as announced in the note above, so enrage American
vfiekz [6]
Because they knew that Germans could sink any ship they want. They could sink civilian ships. Back then, the only way to travel long distances was by boat, because passenger airplanes had not been invented. The Germans could now sink them if they wanted to travel somewhere, so they either risk their life or not go on trips.
5 0
2 years ago
How did the League of Nations pave the way for present-day international organizations?
Anettt [7]
I have the same question I’m looking for the answer
6 0
2 years ago
13.
Katyanochek1 [597]
A: He wanted to quickly end the war in the Pacific without invading.

Germany had surrender by this point in the war, and it was only Japan left, they didn't want to cause more casualties by a full-scale invasion, so they wanted to use the bombs in hopes to end the war for good.
7 0
2 years ago
An unanswered constitutional question about the judicial branch involves
STatiana [176]

Answer:

Its B i believe

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When mexico refused to pay its debt to european countries, what did france do?
    7·1 answer
  • H 1765, Bnitain's Partiament passed a tax on al coionial newspapers, pamphlets, and other papers. What was this act called?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these countries became the leader of the international communist movement following World War 2? OA. Italy OB. The Sovi
    15·1 answer
  • Who were the black panthers?
    7·1 answer
  • Which was one of the first and most powerful European countries in the region? Germany Spain Russia Italy
    6·2 answers
  • Why Israelites felt so strongly about the promised land
    11·2 answers
  • Was Aaron Burr a Traitor? explain why or why not
    9·2 answers
  • Ano ang mga nakaapekto sa mga Meranao kung bakit ganito ang kultura at paniniwala nila sa kasalukuyan?
    5·1 answer
  • Cual fue la causa de la guerra de Troya y cuanto tiempo duro?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe a difference between Democrats and Republicans on which issues they believe should be a top priority .
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!