This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Alanis is sitting down after school to examine the research project she has been assigned in her high-school history class. She must first research the reasons behind the Great Depression in American history. Then, she must develop assertions concerning the best way to nurture a nation's economy. Which type of thinking has her teacher asked her to engage in?
A. Inductive reasoning
B. Deductive reasoning
C. Utilizing representativeness heuristics
D. Utilizing availability heuristics
Answer:
The type of thinking she was asked to engage in is:
A. Inductive reasoning
.
Explanation:
<u>When we engage in inductive reasoning, we use premises to reach a conclusion. In other words, we use data that we know to be true or false to draw possible conclusions from.</u> In inductive reasoning, there is room for error. That is, even if all the premises are true, the conclusion we reach can very well be false. In the case explained in the passage, Alanis has been asked to research the reasons behind the Great Depression. The reasons will be her premises. From them, she must draw a conclusion - how to nurture a nation's economy. However, even with the right and true premises, Alanis can still come up with ideas that wouldn't really work to nurture the economy. That is an example of inductive reasoning.
Answer:
Display rules
Explanation:
Natalie, an American student studying abroad in Taiwan, is at a restaurant when she sees a waitress drop a tray of drinks and then giggle. Natalie finds this reaction odd. This incident is not a sign that the waitress thinks mistakes are funny, but it is instead an example of cross-cultural differences, relayed by display rule;Display rules are a social group or culture's informal norms about how to appropriately express emotions
Answer: first continuous, then partial
Explanation: Continous reinforcement refers to a reinforcement schedule whereby every correct response performed is praised or reinforced, here, every time John's pet correctly performs that trick, the active or response of the pet is rewarded, thus will help carry out the correct response due to the reinforcement it receives. However, after sometime the reinforcement should be partial such that the action isn't reinforced every time the trick is performed. This according to the partial reinforcement extinction effect is more erobust than continuous reimbursement.
I believe this is a bad description of schizophrenia
