1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
4 years ago
9

Evaluate the expression. (3 − 6)4 ÷ 32

Mathematics
1 answer:
Blababa [14]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:-0.375

Step-by-step explanation:

(3-6)4/32 (parenthesis always come first so subtract the parenthesis first).

3-6=-3 then you multiply -3(4)=-12

-12/32=-0.375

You might be interested in
David is a groundskeeper at Triangle Park, scale shown below.
stellarik [79]
Oh you got an answer good luck
3 0
3 years ago
Express 2 as a percentage (no links please)​
lys-0071 [83]
2 is equivalent to 200%

Multiply both numerator and denominator by 100. We do this to find an equivalent fraction having 100 as the denominator.
2 × 100/100

= (2 × 100) × 1/100= 200/100

percentage in notation is : 200%
7 0
3 years ago
What is the value of the expression “two less than six times the difference of a number and five” when n = 9?
34kurt
<span>two less than six times the difference of a number and five
</span>6(n-5) - 2 

<span>when n = 9
</span>6(9-5) - 2
= 6(4) - 2
= 24 - 2
= 22

answer is 22
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can Someone Help Me. ? It’s Between A Or B
Amiraneli [1.4K]

b option is the answer

I am sure

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Type the correct answer in each box. Use numerals instead of words. This table represents function f. x -3 2 3 7 y -2 8 10 18 Co
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

Fredholm's integral equations of the first kind are the prototypical example of ill-posed linear inverse problems. The model, among other things, reconstruction of distorted noisy observations and indirect density estimation and also appear in instrumental variable regression. However, their numerical solution remains a challenging problem. Many techniques currently available require a preliminary discretization of the domain of the solution and make strong assumptions about its regularity. For example, the popular expectation-maximization smoothing (EMS) scheme requires the assumption of piecewise constant solutions which is inappropriate for most applications. We propose here a novel particle method that circumvents these two issues. This algorithm can be thought of as a Monte Carlo approximation of the EMS scheme which not only performs an adaptive stochastic discretization of the domain but also results in smooth approximate solutions. We analyze the theoretical properties of the EMS iteration and of the corresponding particle algorithm. Compared to standard EMS, we show experimentally that our novel particle method provides state-of-the-art performance for realistic systems, including motion deblurring and reconstruction of cross-section images of the brain from positron emission tomography.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • antonio is on the race track team. He ran the 400-meter dash in 1 minute and 20 seconds. The graph shows his performance on the
    11·1 answer
  • A farmer sells 7.1 kilograms of pears and apples at the farmer's market. 3 4 of this weight is pears, and the rest is apples. Ho
    12·1 answer
  • Pleasee help asapp .
    7·2 answers
  • Determine the perimeter of the athletic track
    14·1 answer
  • What is the number in the pattern? 453,463,473,483
    11·2 answers
  • In 2010,85% of the ratings for 1618 video games were E ( for everyone).how many video games received the E rating ?
    9·1 answer
  • If one line is skew to another, then they are (always, sometimes, never) coplanar. Which one?
    6·1 answer
  • If x is 5 what is the value of 4x?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the slope of the line in the graph?<br> 5452-
    5·1 answer
  • I will mark brainliest!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!