Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Hans Island also reminds us of our own potential tenacity when we look forward to the diplomatic negotiations over who owns which parts of the seabed under the Arctic Ocean. Here, a lot more is at stake and in this instance, Canada and Denmark will not be the only contenders. Russia has also filed a claim.
China is the largest producer of hydroelectricity, followed by Canada, Brazil, and the U.S.
<span>Cooking as a family or with friends and loved ones brings us together because we are able to share our culture and heritage through food and give each other nourishment. Coming together and sharing a meal is the most communal and binding thing in almost every place in the world</span>
C) “But I believe that nonviolence is infinitely superior to violence, forgiveness is more manly than punishment...”
