All categories

3 years ago

How would your most recent supervisor or teacher rate your dependability compared to others?

1 answer:

8 0

<span>My most recent supervisor or teacher would rate my dependability compared to others according to how i behave at either at the first try or at the last try. First try means first-time-basis-effect where the supervisor or teacher grades me on first impressions. Recency is based on my last performance.</span>

You might be interested in

Monte’s Coffee Company purchased packaging equipment on January 5, 2014, for $86,900. The equipment was expected to have a usefu

lesantik [10]

Answer:

1.A

2014 Depreciation

Straight line method $26,667

Units-of-output $34,560

Double declining balance $57,933

2015 Depreciation

Straight line method $26,667

Units-of-output $26,840

Double declining balance $19,311

2016 Depreciation

Straight line method $26,667

Units-of-output $18,600

Double declining balance $6,437

1.B Total Depreciation in 3 years

Straight line method $80,000

Units-of-output $80,000

Double declining balance $83,681

2. Double declining balance yields the highest depreciation expense over the three-year life of an equipment

Explanation:

1.A In computing straight line method, the formula would be:

(cost of equipment - salvage value) / life of equipment

2014

(86,900 - 6,900) / 3 years = 26,667

2015

(86,900 - 6,900) / 3 years = 26,667

2016

(86,900 - 6,900) / 3 years = 26,667

TOTAL DEPRECIATION IN 3 YEAR LIFE OF EQUIPMENT = $80,001 ($26,667 + $26,667 + $26,667)

UNITS-OF-OUTPUT METHOD

Formula: (Cost of equipment - salvage value) / total operating hours of equipment x operating hours used for the year

2014

($86,900 - 6,900) / 20,000 x 8,640

($80,000 / 20,000) x 8,640

$4 per hour x 8,640 = $34,560

2015

$86,900 - 6,900) / 20,000 x 6,710

($80,000 / 20,000) x 6,710

$4 per hour x 6,710 = $26,840

2016

$86,900 - 6,900) / 20,000 x 4,650

($80,000 / 20,000) x 4,650

$4 per hour x 4,650 = $18,600

TOTAL DEPRECIATION IN 3 YEAR LIFE OF EQUIPMENT = $80,000 ($34,560 + $26,840 + $18,600)

DOUBLE DECLINING BALANCE

Formula: 100%/life of equipment x 2

*residual value will not be considered in this method of computation of depreciation expense.

2014

100% / 3 years x 2 = 66,67%

86,900 x 66.67% = $57,933

2015

100% / 3 years x 2 = 66,67%

$86,900 - $57,933 = $28,967

$28,967 x 66.67% = $19,311

2016

100% / 3 years x 2 = 66,67%

$86,900 - ($57,933 + $19,311) = $9,656

$9,656 x 66.67% = $6,437

TOTAL DEPRECIATION IN 3 YEAR LIFE OF EQUIPMENT = $83,681 ($57,933 + $19,311+ $6,437)

2. The method that yields most depreciation over the three-year life of an equipment is the DOUBLE DECLINING METHOD in a total amount of $83,681

6 0

3 years ago

not-for-profit organization held the following investments: Investment Cost Fair value (beginning of year) Fair value (end of ye

arsen [322]

Answer:

$14,900

Explanation:

not-for-profit organization will report the investments at the fair value of the investments end of year, in the year-end statement of financial position.

Here,

Investment Fair value (end of year)

Stock A (100 shares) $51

Stock B (200 shares) $49

Stock A = (100 * 51) = $5,100

Stock B = (200 * 49) = $9,800

Total Investment fair value at end of year = $14,900

$14,900 will be the amount reported in stock investments in the year-end statement of financial position.

3 0

3 years ago

Real GDP per capita is NOT an adequate measure of

mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

The correct answer is the well-being of each person in an economy.

Explanation:

Also known as the "Standard of living", this is something that cannot be reflected from the per capital income, whether it's nominal or real. The reason is when you divide the GDP from the population, the assumption is all the GDP is distributed among the population equally.

But this is not the case in the real world and there are many variances, discrimination, discrepancies and inequalities when the wealth and resources are distributed.

5 0

3 years ago

The cost to manufacture one unit of Killian Audio Products' best-selling hearing aid, the Zone, is $67.50. The CFO of the compan

ikadub [295]

Answer:

Economies of scale

Explanation:

Economies of scale refers to reducing total costs per unit by increasing total output. All companies have certain fixed costs, some companies have higher fixed costs than others, but they always exist. When you are producing something, the cost equation is production costs = variable costs per unit + average fixed costs per unit.

Variable costs vary directly with output, while fixed costs do not, e.g. salaries can be fixed, depreciation, rent, interests, etc. The higher the output, the lower the average fixed cost per unit.

Also, sometimes variable costs can also decrease as total output increases. E.g. you can get higher discounts for purchasing larger quantities of materials and supplies.

4 0

3 years ago

A portfolio is entirely invested into BBB stock, which is expected to return 16.4 percent, and ZI bonds, which are expected to r

Mashutka [201]

Answer:

the expected return on the portfolio is 12.34%

Explanation:

The computation of the expected return on the portfolio is shown below:

Expected Return is

= Investment in BBB × Return+ Investment in ZI × Return

= 16.4 × 48% + 8.6 ×52%

= 7.87% + 4.47%

= 12.34%

hence, the expected return on the portfolio is 12.34%

7 0

2 years ago