None of those answers are correct sadly.
tis noteworthy that the segment contains endpoints of A and C and the point B is in between A and C cutting the segment in a 1:2 ratio,
![\bf \textit{internal division of a line segment using ratios} \\\\\\ A(-9,-7)\qquad C(x,y)\qquad \qquad \stackrel{\textit{ratio from A to C}}{1:2} \\\\\\ \cfrac{A\underline{B}}{\underline{B} C} = \cfrac{1}{2}\implies \cfrac{A}{C}=\cfrac{1}{2}\implies 2A=1C\implies 2(-9,-7)=1(x,y)\\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ B=\left(\frac{\textit{sum of "x" values}}{\textit{sum of ratios}}\quad ,\quad \frac{\textit{sum of "y" values}}{\textit{sum of ratios}}\right)\\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Binternal%20division%20of%20a%20line%20segment%20using%20ratios%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20A%28-9%2C-7%29%5Cqquad%20C%28x%2Cy%29%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bratio%20from%20A%20to%20C%7D%7D%7B1%3A2%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Ccfrac%7BA%5Cunderline%7BB%7D%7D%7B%5Cunderline%7BB%7D%20C%7D%20%3D%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7BA%7D%7BC%7D%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%202A%3D1C%5Cimplies%202%28-9%2C-7%29%3D1%28x%2Cy%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20B%3D%5Cleft%28%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsum%20of%20%22x%22%20values%7D%7D%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsum%20of%20ratios%7D%7D%5Cquad%20%2C%5Cquad%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsum%20of%20%22y%22%20values%7D%7D%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsum%20of%20ratios%7D%7D%5Cright%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill)
![\bf B=\left(\cfrac{(2\cdot -9)+(1\cdot x)}{1+2}\quad ,\quad \cfrac{(2\cdot -7)+(1\cdot y)}{1+2}\right)~~=~~(-4,-6) \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \cfrac{(2\cdot -9)+(1\cdot x)}{1+2}=-4\implies \cfrac{-18+x}{3}=-4 \\\\\\ -18+x=-12\implies \boxed{x=6} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \cfrac{(2\cdot -7)+(1\cdot y)}{1+2}=-6\implies \cfrac{-14+y}{3}=-6 \\\\\\ -14+y=-18\implies \boxed{y=-4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20B%3D%5Cleft%28%5Ccfrac%7B%282%5Ccdot%20-9%29%2B%281%5Ccdot%20x%29%7D%7B1%2B2%7D%5Cquad%20%2C%5Cquad%20%5Ccfrac%7B%282%5Ccdot%20-7%29%2B%281%5Ccdot%20y%29%7D%7B1%2B2%7D%5Cright%29~~%3D~~%28-4%2C-6%29%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Ccfrac%7B%282%5Ccdot%20-9%29%2B%281%5Ccdot%20x%29%7D%7B1%2B2%7D%3D-4%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B-18%2Bx%7D%7B3%7D%3D-4%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-18%2Bx%3D-12%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7Bx%3D6%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Ccfrac%7B%282%5Ccdot%20-7%29%2B%281%5Ccdot%20y%29%7D%7B1%2B2%7D%3D-6%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B-14%2By%7D%7B3%7D%3D-6%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-14%2By%3D-18%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7By%3D-4%7D)
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
(p*-5)-2=-42
-5p-2=-42
-5p=-42+2=-40
-5p/-5=-40/-5
=8
Answer:
t= i/pr
Step-by-step explanation:
We were given that the amount of simple interest earned is given by the formula, i= prt
The above formula is an example of a literal equation.
We want to solve this formula for T.
But we can observe that the product of two letters are multiplying the letter T.
So we multiply both sides of the literal equation by the reciprocal of PR witch is 1/PR to obtain, I*1/PR=*PRT
This implies that, i/pr=t
We can rewrite this as, t=i/pr
Therefore the correct answer is C.
Answer:
C. 76 + 7i
Step-by-step explanation:
49 squared is 7 and since it's negative, it is an imaginary number. Therefore, it is 7i. Which leaves C to be the correct option.
