Answer:
The windows are as unpleasant as other things in the world.
This question is about "A New England Nun"
Answer:
During Joe Dagget's visit to Louisa we can infer that he cares and likes her.
Explanation:
Louisa and Joe Dagget made a promise that they would get married after Joe returned from his travels in Australia. Joe returns after 14, when he and Louisa have had new experiences and developed different goals for their life. Louisa no longer wants to marry Joe, but the promise must be kept and Joe visits her frequently. These visits make it seem that Joe likes and cares about Louisa, which is true, but as we read on, we learn that Joe is in love with another woman, but to keep the promise and not to sadden Louisa, he would marry her.
Answer:
i hope u tat uy have a good trouble from tommorow okk bie
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read "Cooking Time", by Anita Roy (found in "Eat the sky, drink the ocean").
How does the character of Mandy contribute to the theme of the story?
A. Mandy’s decision to travel back in time shows the dangers of technology.
B. Mandy’s longing for real food shows that scientific advancement comes at a price.
C. Mandy’s escape from MasterChef shows that scientific advancements are useful to most people.
D. Mandy’s love of cooking illustrates that people should follow their dreams in spite of any obstacles.
Answer: D. Mandy’s love of cooking illustrates that people should follow their dreams in spite of any obstacles.
Explanation:
Mandy´s decision to go off the grid through Masterchef´s time traveling in order to be able to cook real food, which is her most desired dream, and even attempt to change the post-apocalyptic dystopia when real food is replaced by Newtri, illustrates the theme of the story being that we should always follow our dreams, even at great risk.
Answer:
Not all of the writer’s evidence is relevant to her argument, though. In defending the movie version of the book, she cites reviewer Peter Rainer:
Reviewers have offered equally high praise for the movie. Film critic Peter Rainer notes in his online movie review for the ?Christian Science Monitor,? “the great conundrum of the Holocaust is that it was perpetrated by human beings, not monsters. Few movies have rendered this puzzle so powerfully.” (Rainer, November 8, 2008) It is interesting to note that Rainer has also reviewed Richard Linklater’s ? Boyhood.? ?Boyhood ? is another child-centered movie. (Rainer, July 11, 2014)
Rainer’s comments about the strength of the movie are relevant. But the fact that Rainer has reviewed other child-centered movies adds nothing to the claim the writer is trying to support.
No writer is entirely wrong or entirely right. By applying critical analysis to the full text of a persuasive selection, readers can evaluate the persuasiveness of the arguments. Reading critically is essential for readers who want to navigate their way through published opinions, editorials, blog posts, theater and movie reviews, or any other persuasive texts. First, identify the writer’s claim. Second, examine the supporting evidence for relevance and reliability. Finally, decide whether or not the writer has argued for his or her claim persuasively
