Answer:
The following conversation is acceptable.
Explanation:
Squilliam- "Hello James, It has been a while"
James- "Hello Squilliam, nice to see you recovered from that horrible incident"
Squilliam- "yes, it is isn't it"
James- "I like the outfit, but this is isn't a fancy dress party"
Squilliam- "Oh it isn't? Then why did you come dressed like a home less man?"
James- "Very funny Squilliam, any marriages you want to ruin again? or was that just for last year?"
Squilliam- "I don't know James, any houses you want to burn down? Or was mine enough for you?"
Simile:
My mothers hands are like a comforting plush/pillow. ((Soft hands))
Metaphor:
My mothers hands are gold. (( Rare ))
Personification:
My mothers hands had little kids that danced to the music. ((Snapping your fingers/Clapping your hands))
Sorry I only did one each but hopefully this helped!!
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
A: Cast of characters
Explanation:
Dispite it may seem as if it is D, this is highlighting the cast.
Answer: Choice #3
Explanation: The vocabulary and sentence structure are better put together and more advanced.
