I beleive that it is (C). but when i did my resaerch it really didnt give me word for word so that my answer
Answer:
I. x = -3
II. y = -2
Explanation:
Given the following algebraic equation;
.........equation 1
..........equation 2
We would solve the algebraic equation using the substitution method
From equation 1;
.....equation 3
Substituting eqn 3 into eqn 2, we have;
Multiplying all through by 5
Rearranging the equation, we have:
x = -3
Next we find the value of y;
From eqn 3;
Substituting the value of "x" into the equation, we have;
y = -2
There are two important responsibilities that are only for U.S. citizens: to vote in federal elections and to serve on a jury. ... By voting, citizens are participating in the democratic process. Citizens vote for leaders to represent them and their ideas, and the leaders support the citizens' interests.
Answer:
Farmers growing high-yield crops are more likely to be self-sufficient and thus require less support from the rest of society.
Explanation:
Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
