Answer:
I agree.
Explanation:
Genevieve Willians is a writer and for that reason, she is a very creative person, since creativity is essential for the accomplishment of her work. In addition, she is a native of Cajun country, proudly presenting and defending cultural values and characteristics.
Cajun country is also very proud of her, for being a very fertile person and with the ease of writing stories that enchant many people.
Answer:
Ruth convinces Robert to stay on the farm rather than leave on his planned trip with his uncle. This changes the direction of the plot because rather than following his dream of travel, Robert is staying on the farm where he will likely be unhappy. This is foreshadowed as the scene comes to a close:
RUTH. (in a soft murmur) Yes. Our very own star. (They stand for a moment looking up at it, their arms around each other. Then RUTH takes his hand again and starts to lead him away) Come, Rob, let’s go. (His eyes are fixed again on the horizon as he half turns to follow her. RUTH urges) We’ll be late for supper, Rob.
ROBERT. (shakes his head impatiently, as though he were throwing off some disturbing thought—with a laugh) All right. We’ll run then. Come on! (They run off laughing as The Curtain Falls)
Explanation: Plato Answer
True this is a true statement
Answer: D. Champollion wrote in his journal: "At last I have visited the palace, or rather the city, of monuments, Karnak. . . . No nation on earth, ancient or modern, has ever conceived architecture on so noble and vast a scale. . . ."
Explanation:
The detail from the excerpt that is the best evidence to support the thesis will be option D "Champollion wrote in his journal: "At last I have visited the palace, or rather the city, of monuments, Karnak. . . . No nation on earth, ancient or modern, has ever conceived architecture on so noble and vast a scale. . . ."
This can be seen in the excerpt and really doesn't need an explanation.
Answer:
Overall, in “Two Ways of Seeing a River”, Mark Twain addresses the importance of understanding the extent of the merits of what people have. He questions whether experience and knowledge are more rewarding than the vivid perception of things and the ability to see meaning beyond their surface.