All categories

3 years ago

A market share of 78.5 percent would be represented in a pie chart by a slice with a central angle of:

1 answer:

7 0

The angle in a pie chart is proportional to the percentage. THe chart is a circle and thus has 360 degrees. Suppose the angle is x degrees. We then have that x/360=78.5/100 due to proportionality. Hence, x=78.5*360/100=282.6. This is the value of the angle in degrees that corresponds to this percentage share.

You might be interested in

Angela Fox and Zooey Caulfield were food and nutrition majors at State University, as well as close friends and roommates. Upon

S_A_V [24]

Answer:

a) maximize 12x+16y subject to x+y≤60; x+2y≤80; 2x-3y≥0; x-9y≤0.

b) 40 fish and 20 beef dinners

c) $800

Explanation:

Let x and y represent the numbers of fish and beef dinners to prepare, respectively. Then the relations these values must satisfy are ...

x + y ≤ 60 . . . . . a maximum of 60 dinners will be sold

0.25x + 0.50y ≤ 20 . . . . . kitchen hours cannot exceed 20

x/y ≥ 3/2 . . . . . . at least 3 fish dinners for each 2 beef dinners will be sold

y ≥ 0.10(x +y) . . . . at least 10% of dinners sold will be beef

While satisfying these relations, we want to maximize the profit function:

p = 12x +16y

a) The linear programming problem can be formulated as ...

Maximize 12x +16y, subject to ...

x + y ≤ 60
x + 2y ≤ 80
2x - 3y ≥ 0
x - 9y ≤ 0

b) The graph shows the constraint inequalities with the comparison symbol reversed. The effect of that is to shade the area that is NOT part of the solution set, leaving the feasible region white. The vertex of the (white) feasible region that makes the profit line farthest from the origin is the solution we're looking for. Once the profit line is plotted so we can compare its slope to the lines bounding the feasible region, it becomes clear which vertex is the one that maximizes profit.

The solution is (x, y) = (40, 20).

40 fish dinners
20 beef dinners

c) The maximum earnings are estimated to be ...

($12)(40) +($16)(20) = $800

5 0

4 years ago

The corporate practice of acquiring or producing quality goods or services at a lower cost abroad thereby eliminating domestic p

nydimaria [60]

Answer:

a. outsourcing

Explanation:

Outsourcing can be regarded as a cost cutting measures in an organization, it involves the hiring of other party from another organization to perform some services or production in ones organization. The instances of outsourcing are Hiring human resource management as well as facilities management. Another one is hiring a

supply chain management,

It should be noted that The corporate practice of acquiring or producing quality goods or services at a lower cost abroad thereby eliminating domestic production is called outsourcing

5 0

3 years ago

An incentive compensation scheme includes a. a performance evaluation system b. a disciplinary action committee c. a reward s

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": Both A&C.

Explanation:

Incentive compensation schemes are established provided by employers based on the performance of employees. Employers set a reward system that could take the form of bonuses, prizes or recognition, and goals workers should reach or pass so those rewards can be provided.

Incentives are given at work aiming to motivate employees to work efficiently and effectively.

5 0

3 years ago

Metlock, Inc. uses the lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value basis for its inventory. The following data are available at Decemb

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

The $5,434 is the the amount of the ending inventory by applying the lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value basis.

Explanation:

Based on the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the inventory value should be recorded at the cost or net realizable value whichever is lower.

So, by using the above information. Now we can compute the ending inventory.

For Camera :

1. Minolta = Unit price × lower cost of Net realizable value or cost

= 3 × 156

= $468

2. Canon = Unit price × lower cost of Net realizable value or cost

= 10 × 147

= $1,470

For Light Meters:

1. Vivitar = Unit price × lower cost of Net realizable value or cost

= 15 × 104

= $1,560

2. Kodak = Unit price × lower cost of Net realizable value or cost

= 16 × 121

= $1,936

So, the ending inventory is sum of the value of all products which is equals to

Minolta + Canon + Vivitar + Kodak

$468 + $1,470 + $1,560 + $1,936

$5,434

Hence, $5,434 is the the amount of the ending inventory by applying the lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value basis.

7 0

3 years ago

1. Which one of the following is a correct statement about franchisees?

worty [1.4K]

Answer:

A Franchisee sell the right to make a product to franchisors

6 0

3 years ago