If they have alot of money then it might be hard for them to save because they have enough or if they dont have alot of money then they just wanna have alot of items i do that sometimes☺
Answer:
the price per share in the case when A offers B is $200
Explanation:
The computation of the price per share is as follows:
The fair value is
= ($60 + $120) × 50%
= $90
The 50% represent the percentage of equally
Now the price per share is
= $90 + $90 + $20
= $90 + $110
= $200
Hence, the price per share in the case when A offers B is $200
The same is to be considered
Answer:
US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.
Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)
China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.
However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.
Mediation maybe I think that’s the correct answer
$900,000
Depreciation for the year $600,000
Employee bonuses $1,200,000
Total expenses for the year 1,800,000
Expenses to be reported in interim income statement 1,800,000=$900,000