We are given that in 1943, an organization surveyed 1100 adults and asked, "Are you a total abstainer from, or do you on occasion consume, alcoholic beverages?"

Of the 1100 adults surveyed, 429 indicated that they were total abstainers. In a recent survey, the same question was asked of 1100 adults and 352 in

Let p = proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol.

where, p = $\frac{429}{1100}$ = 0.39

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : p = 39% {means that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has not changed}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : p $\neq$ 39% {means that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has changed}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample z proportion statistics;

T.S. = $\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p$ = sample proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol = $\frac{352}{1100}$ = 0.32

n = sample of adults surveyed = 1100

So, test statistics = $\frac{0.32-0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.32(1-0.32)}{1100} } }$

= -4.976

The value of z test statistics is -4.976.

Now, at 0.10 significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.645 and 1.645 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistics doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the proportion of adults who totally abstain from alcohol has changed.

4 0

2 years ago

Find the measure of the missing angles in the kite

frutty [35]

Answer: 360 - 44 - 80 = 236

236 ÷ 2 = 118

both angle equal to 118

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago