All categories

3 years ago

Find two numbers whose sum is 119 such that one number is 5 less than three times the other.

1 answer:

vladimir2022 [97]3 years ago

3 0

You can set it up like this:

x + (3x - 5) = 119

Add 5 to both sides:

x + 3x = 124

Combine like terms:

4x = 124

Divide both sides by 4:

x = 31

So, one number is 31, and since the other is 5 less than three times that number, it's 31(3) - 5 = 88. To check, add the two (31 and 88) together, and sure enough, the answer is 119!

Hope this helped!! xx

You might be interested in

Need help ASAP !!!!!

Flura [38]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

12x + 20+40 = 180

12x = 120

X = 10

6 0

3 years ago

Worth 100 points<br><br> whats 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 ?

Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Test the claim that the mean GPA of Orange Coast students is smaller than the mean GPA of Coastline students at the 0.005 signif

algol [13]

Answer:

a) F. H 0 : μ O ≥ μ C

H 1 : μ O < μ C

b) B. two-tailed

d) $t=\frac{(2.91-2.96)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{0.05^2}{60}+\frac{0.03^2}{60}}}}=-6.64$

e) $p_v =P(t_{118}$

f) B. Reject the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

$\bar X_{O}=2.91$ represent the mean for the Orange Coast

$\bar X_{C}=2.96$ represent the mean for the Coastline

$s_{O}=0.05$ represent the sample standard deviation for Orange Coast

$s_{C}=0.03$ represent the sample standard deviation for Coastline

$n_{O}=60$ sample size for Orange Coast

$n_{C}=60$ sample size for Coastline

$\alpha=0.005$ Significance level provided

t would represent the statistic

Part a

For this case we want to test the claim that the mean GPA of Orange Coast students is smaller than the mean GPA of Coastline students

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{O} \geq \mu_{C}$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{O} < \mu_{C}$

F. H 0 : μ O ≥ μ C

H 1 : μ O < μ C

Part b

For this case we need to conduct a left tailed test.

B. two-tailed

Part d

The statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{(\bar X_{O}-\bar X_{C})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{O}}{n_{O}}+\frac{s^2_{C}}{n_{C}}}}$ (1)

And the degrees of freedom are given by $df=n_1 +n_2 -2=60+60-2=118$

Replacing the info we got:

$t=\frac{(2.91-2.96)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{0.05^2}{60}+\frac{0.03^2}{60}}}}=-6.64$

Part e

We can calculate the p value with this probability:

$p_v =P(t_{118}$

Part f

Since the p value is a very low value compared to the significance level given of 0.005 we can reject the null hypothesis.

B. Reject the null hypothesis

5 0

2 years ago

A hair salon in Cambridge, Massachusetts, reports that on seven randomly selected weekdays, the number of customers who visited

morpeh [17]

Answer:

a: 28 < µ < 34

Step-by-step explanation:

We need the mean, var, and standard deviation for the data set. See first attached photo for calculations for these...

We get a mean of 222/7 = 31.7143

and a sample standard deviation of: 4.3079

We can now construct our confidence interval. See the second attached photo for the construction steps.

They want a 90% confidence interval. Our sample size is 7, so since n < 30, we will use a t-score. Look up the value under the 10% area in 2 tails column, and degree of freedom is 6 (degree of freedom is always 1 less than sample size for confidence intervals when n < 30)

The t-value is: 1.943

We rounded down to the nearest person in the interval because we don't want to over estimate. It said 28.55, so more than 28 but not quite 29, so if we use 29 as the lower limit, we could over estimate. It's better to use 28 and underestimate a little when considering customer flow.

5 0

3 years ago

Please help me fill this in

Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

380.13m squared

you take half of the diameter for the radius and you do 11 squared times pie

7 0

3 years ago