Answer:
Any extreme is bad. It is bad for a speaker to stand on the same spot without moving during his/her entire speech, and it is also bad for him/her to constantly move. The key to being effective in keeping a balance is choosing the right movements for complementing the message he/she is delivering, making the speech more authentic.
I'm leaning towards false for both.
The correct answer is A) Kinesics add meaning, mood, or impact to speech's verbal content.
Public speakers should use kinesics (bodily movements, gestures, facial expressions) when addressing audiences. Which of the following statements best expresses a rhetorical rationale for this presentational component?
Answer: "Kinesics add meaning, mood, or impact to speech's verbal content."
Indeed professional speakers should support their presentation with kinesics. Facial expressions, body movements, the use of hands, posture, and the confidence he reflects during his speech, are integral and important components of any professional presentation.
It is hard to keep audiences involved during a speech. That is why the speaker needs a series of resources and tools such as visual aids and technology, as well as the correct personality that projects confidence to capture his audience.
I believe the answer is: <span> being more adaptable to, and flexible in, choosing how to respond to situations across cultures
Every cultures has a certain unique values and tradition that become the foundation of almost every decision making made by the members of that culture. Since this would most likely affect the outcome of the job, the workers need to be able to adapt to the unique culture that they face on the field.</span>
