Answer: Reciprocal determinism
Explanation: As the name of this psychological phenomenon implies, it is a reciprocity established between the influence of the environment on the individual, but also the reverse influence of the individual on the environment. This theory of Albert Bandura talks about personal factors and behavior of a person on the one hand, and social circumstances, environment on the other, which exert influence on one another.
So Nadine shows concern for everyone around her, influenced by the environment, claiming that the world is a dangerous place. However, how Nadine influences the environment, according to Bandura, her personal cognitive skills and attitude, that is, her reactions to environmental events, also determines and shapes her thinking about the environment. Thus, the reactions of the individual may be too weak or too strong, at some event, at some point.
Answer:
C- Cyberlaw
Explanation:
Cyberlaw are internet law that guide or regulate how people make use of the internet.
Cyberlaw is vital because it touches almost all aspects of transactions and activities concerning the Internet by dealing with the Internet's relationship to technological and electronic elements which include computers, software, hardware and information systems (IS).
The emerging body of law that governs transactions conducted via the Internet is referred called CYBERLAW
Junta Because well that is the awnser there is no need to explain because is it a multiple choice question
Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.
1926 Standard or
Part 1926 Standard
Which comes from the OSHA Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 29 CFR 1926.
