The fact that people who watch a lot of violent TV are also more likely to be aggressive does not in itself proof a cause-effect relationship. That is, there is no evidence that one situation is a cause and the other one is a consequence (causation). It only proves that both characteristics are present together (correlation).
This could be a case of “spurious correlation,” which implies that two characteristics are often present together because there is a third factor that influences both of them.
For example, if we assume that this case refers to minors, it could be that minors who watch a lot of violent TV are neglected by their parents. Additionally, it could be that children who behave aggressively are also neglected by their parents. If that were the case, then being neglected would be a more likely predictor of violent behaviour, as opposed to watching violent TV.
In order to make sure there is a cause-effect relationship, we would need to perform an experiment where all other factors are controlled.
Answer:
d. individual prisons exceeded 100 percent intended capacity.
Explanation:
In the 2011 case of Brown v. Plata , the Supreme Court ordered California to release prisoners if individual prisons exceeded 100 percent intended capacity.
The Supreme Court made the order to the state of California to release prisoners if they could not provide a constitutionally mandated level of prison holding numbers.
Q. What is the difference between varna and jati as expressions of classical India's caste system? The varna system was older. ... Jatis became the primary cells of social life in India beyond the family or household. Each jati was associated with one of the great classes or with the untouchables.
Answer:
It might be from the 1788 because the people you see their are you know.
