Answer:
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8–1) that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held, violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion.” (The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)
Explanation:
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8–1) <em>that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. </em>Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held that to violate the establishment clause of the <em>First Amendment,</em> which prohibits Congress from making any law <em>“respecting an establishment of religion.” </em>(The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)
Answer: b. A backward design
Explanation:
Backward design is a curriculum plan that begins by setting the main goals, to only then create assessments and evaluation techniques, and finally develop lesson plans. It usually includes three steps:
Recognize the ideas and skills to be learned according to curriculum expectations.
Determine assessment assignments that provide acceptable evidence that confirms that the sought outcomes have been achieved.
Outline learning exercises aimed to obtain the desired results.
The answer to your question is matter
It is possible to exist inherently ambiguous languages generated by unambiguous grammar; however, it is not possible to have ambiguous grammar and unambiguous grammar for the same language: FALSE
<h3>
What is Ambiguous grammar?</h3>
- In computer science, an ambiguous grammar is one in which a string can have more than one leftmost derivation or parse tree, whereas an unambiguous grammar is one in which every valid string has a unique leftmost derivation or parse tree.
- Many languages allow both ambiguous and unambiguous grammar, while others solely allow ambiguous grammar.
- Any non-empty language can accept ambiguous grammar by introducing a duplicate rule or synonym into unambiguous grammar (the only language without ambiguous grammar is the empty language).
- Inherently ambiguous languages formed by the unambiguous grammar are not possible because that is the concept of inherent ambiguity.
- No DCFL is fundamentally ambiguous; every DCFL must have some unambiguous grammar.
Therefore, the statement "it is possible to exist inherently ambiguous languages generated by unambiguous grammar; however, it is not possible to have ambiguous grammar and unambiguous grammar for the same language" is FALSE.
Know more about Ambiguous grammar here:
brainly.com/question/12972361
#SPJ4
The complete question is given below:
It is possible to exist inherently ambiguous languages generated by unambiguous grammar; however, it is not possible to have ambiguous grammar and unambiguous grammar for the same language. TRUE or FALSE.