1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following statements about contract revocation is TRUE? It may not relieve the revoking party of contract obligatio

ns. It cancels all obligations of both parties. It can only be used if both parties agree to the revocation. It leaves the non-revoking party without any legal remedies.
Social Studies
1 answer:
loris [4]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It may not relieve the revoking party of contract obligations.

Explanation:

Contract revocation can occur in different ways, the most common being when one of the parties revokes the contract. An act of revocation could include recalling, cancelling, or annulling the contract. But the revoking party may not be relieved of it contracts obligations

You might be interested in
How did Jackson’s as a leader cause the Indian removal of act
mel-nik [20]

Answer:

To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.

8 0
3 years ago
Banks and other financial institutions use savings deposits to help borrowers by A) using deposits to make loans. B) keeping dep
blondinia [14]
Its A... I like 99.99% sure it's A. because you have to pay back what you borrowed from the banm
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a dog what dose it do to you
Amanda [17]

Answer:

A dog is a animal

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The U.S. Supreme Court defines materiality as "the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in l
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer: False

Explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't defines materiality as "the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement." Instead, materiality is defined as “generally states that information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that the omitted or misstated item would have been viewed by a reasonable resource provider as having significantly altered the total mix of information,”

3 0
3 years ago
I only have 4 more minutes to turn this in PLS HELP
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

it was a trading center

Explanation:

hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did Canada solve economic problems in the early 1900s
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the delegates draft a new plan instead of revising the articles?
    15·2 answers
  • (98 Points & Brainliest)
    13·1 answer
  • According to Rogers, children who experience ____ love or affection tend to develop an incongruent self-concept as a result of b
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Japanese imperial court system of appointing government officials lead to the rise of the Fujiwara family?
    10·2 answers
  • "i never want to see a man again! i want to live in a community of women where it's possible to create a life that is peaceful a
    13·1 answer
  • A small body in space, usually composed of rock or metal
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the israelites wander in the desert for 40 years.
    12·1 answer
  • What causes the cost of a good to increase?
    6·2 answers
  • McCulloch v. Maryland was the 1819 Supreme Court case dealing mostly with the issue of
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!