<span>British blocking american shipping lanes and seizing men and ships. The War between England and France, That is the answer for the first part, the second part is a little too difficilt</span>
Diversity is the difference between people
Answer:
I had disagreed. I responded to it by calmly stating my opinion towards the point that had been raised and made sure that I didn't offend anyone during me doing so.
A body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed.Please mark me brainlist answer!
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
