1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garik1379 [7]
3 years ago
9

The following table shows the relationship between the time taken to perform the jumps by Maria. Determine whether the number of

jumps is proportional to the number of seconds. If the relationship is proportional, identify the constant of proportionality.
Time (seconds)
45

60

105

141

174

Jumps completed by Maria
15

20

35

47

58

Question 8 options:

not proportional; 3

proportional; 3

not proportional;

proportional;
Mathematics
2 answers:
Serggg [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct option is B) proportional; 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the provided table.

The constant of proportionality (k) is equal to y/x.

For the provided table the constant of proportionality will be:

k=\frac{Time}{Jumps}

Now find the proportionality as shown:

Time (seconds)     Jumps     proportionality k=\frac{Time}{Jumps}

45                             15          k=\frac{45}{15}=3

60                             20          k=\frac{60}{20}=3

105                            35          k=\frac{105}{35}=3

141                             47          k=\frac{141}{47}=3

174                             58          k=\frac{174}{58}=3

That means Maria can jump once in 3 second.

Hence, the above table is proportional; 3

Therefore, the correct option is B) proportional; 3

pychu [463]3 years ago
4 0

so

she jumps once every 3 seconds

You might be interested in
I need help with 1 2 3
g100num [7]
D D B I think this should be right
7 0
3 years ago
Seclect all the sets of numbers that are possible values for x in the inequalit, x > - 8. { -10, -8, -6}. { -8, 0, 8}. { -9,
Sauron [17]

Answer:

{ -6, -4, -2}

Step-by-step explanation:

Since x > - 8, x can be any number greater than - 8.

x = -7, -6, -5, -4,...

BUT, it can't be equal because it's not using this sign \geq

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. { -10, -8, -6} can't be an inequality of x because it has -10, -8.

2.{ -8, 0, 8} can't be an inequality of x because of -8.

3.{ -9, 1, 7} can't be an inequality of x because -9 isn't greater than x.

4 0
3 years ago
a fox a coyote and a wolf weigh a total of 120 pounds the ratio of the weight of fox to the weight of coyote is 3:8 the weight o
ira [324]
There is not enough information to calculate this. 

<span>Knowing the weight ratio of the fox to coyote as 3:8 in no way allows you to know the respective ratio of the wolf. To know the weight of the wolf would require knowing its ratio value, then the weights of all 3 is an easy calculation. </span>
<span>Example - 3:8:15 (f:c:w) is a plausible ratio based upon real-world weight averages for certain species/subspecies of the three. </span>
<span>- knowing the values of the 3 terms as 3:8:15 gives a total of 3+8+15 = 26 ratio values </span>
<span>- you then simply divide the total weight by this ratio value total; 120/26 = 4.62 </span>
<span>- so each ratio value is 4.62 units of weight*** </span>
<span>- now, simply calculate the weight of each canid by multiplying its ratio value by the unit of weight... </span>
<span>fox; 3 x 4.62 = 13.86 </span>
<span>coyote; 8 x 4.62 = 36.96 </span>
<span>wolf; 15 x 4.62 = 69.3 </span>
<span>Validate the ratios by adding the weights together (we should get 120) 13.86 + 36.96 + 69.3 = 120.12 </span>
<span>The total is slightly out because that 4.62 figure was a rounding up. </span>

<span>Now, the thing is, there is nothing given that allows us to know exactly what ratio value the wolf should be, I chose 15 myself because that is a real-world plausible value when compared to 3:8 for the other 2. Changing it to 16, say, means that there are now 27 ratio values total giving a ratio value of 120/27 = 4.44 obviously changing the weights of all 3.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
X+4 algebraic expression
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

so whats the question

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How to do -4x+5y+6z?
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

There are no like terms to therefore the answer is -4x+5y+6z

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What percent of 300 is 51
    15·2 answers
  • Dalin is 16 years old hey sister is 3/4 of his age How old is his sister
    10·1 answer
  • Los numeros primos menores que 15​
    12·2 answers
  • the following table shows a proportional relationship between a and b . write an equation to describe the relationship between a
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASEE HELPPP MEE WITH THIS QUESTION
    14·1 answer
  • A recent study reported that the prevalence of hyperlipidemia (defined as total cholesterol over 200) is 30% in children 2-6 yea
    9·1 answer
  • Two students are going to the store to buy school supplies for the new school year. One of the students buys 2 packs of pencils
    11·1 answer
  • A saleswomen is paid $10 per hour and $6 for each sale she makes. She wants to earn more than $150 in a 8-hour work period.
    7·1 answer
  • I need help will mark brainliest​
    9·1 answer
  • HELLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!