Question

Summarize your contribution to Part II of the discussion. Did you argue that Wharton’s structure makes the story more interesting to read? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Answer:

In this book Wharton uses several techniques that change the time frames of the story. As we have seen, the introduction begins more than twenty years after the original story has taken place. In addition, Wharton injects flashbacks at other junctures. For example, in Chapter 4 the omniscient narrator tells some of Frome's back story. Knowledge about Frome's family helps us, the reader understand his emotions and reactions to events. I think this structure makes the story more interesting because it gives the reader more understanding of what is happening throughout the story

Answer 2

The constraint social and moral concerns place on individual desire is perhaps the novel’s most prominent theme, since Ethan Frome’s plot is concerned with Ethan’s desire for a woman who is not his wife. By denying Zeena a single positive attribute while presenting Mattie as the epitome of glowing, youthful attractiveness, Wharton renders Ethan’s desire to cheat on his wife perfectly understandable. The conflict does not stem from within Ethan’s own heart—his feelings for Mattie never waver. Instead, the conflict occurs between his passions and the constraints placed on him by society, which control his conscience and impede his fulfillment of his passions.

Again and again, Wharton displays the hold that social convention has on Ethan’s desires. Although he has one night alone with Mattie, he cannot help but be reminded of his domestic duties as he sits in his kitchen. He plans to elope and run away to the West, but he cannot bring himself to lie to his neighbors in order to procure the necessary money—and so on. In the end, Ethan opts out of the battle between his desires and social and moral orders. Lacking the courage and strength of will to face down their force, he chooses to abandon life’s burdens by abandoning life itself.