All categories

3 years ago

The basic principles of economics suggest that_________.

Business

1 answer:

Montano1993 [528]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Answer is option d, i.e. All of the above are correct.

Explanation:

All the given statements are correct.

Markets are considered to be the best way to organize economic activity, and this can be done by studying the market trends and various demands of the customers. This would help in assessing the estimation of supply that any organization would like to deliver to its respective customers. Similarly, the intervention of government and legal aspects are also important in maintaining both, the trade between the companies of different countries, and also if any organization fails to produce and deliver the required result.

You might be interested in

A currency trader observes the following quotes in the spot market: 1 U.S. dollar = 122 Japanese yen 1 British pound = 2.25 Swis

andrezito [222]

Answer:

88.38

Explanation:

Given;

1 U.S. dollar = 122 Japanese yen

1 British pound = 2.25 Swiss francs

1 British pound = 1.63 U.S. dollars

Therefore,

2.25 Swiss francs = 1.63 U.S. dollars

1 US. dollar = 2.25/1.63 Swiss francs

1 US dollar = 1.38 Swiss francs

since

1 U.S. dollar = 122 Japanese yen then,

1.38 Swiss francs = 122 Japanese yen

1 Swiss francs = 122/1.38 Japanese yen

1 Swiss francs = 88.38 Japanese yen

1 Swiss franc can be used to purchase 88.38 Japanese yen.

8 0

3 years ago

Sanford Co. sells $500,000 of 10% bonds on March 1, 2020. The bonds pay interest on September 1 and March 1. The due date of the

Triss [41]

Answer:

ATTACHED file with the bonds schedule

Explanation:

First, we solve for the proceed from the issuance:

PV of the coupon:

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 25,000.000 (500,000 x 10%/2)

time 7 (3 and a half year x 2 payment per year)

rate 0.06 (12% annual / 2)

$25000 \times \frac{1-(1+0.06)^{-7} }{0.06} = PV\\$

PV $139,559.5360

PV of maturity:

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity 500,000.00

time 7.00

rate 0.06

$\frac{500000}{(1 + 0.06)^{7} } = PV$

PV 332,528.56

PV c $139,559.5360

PV m $332,528.5568

Total $472,088.0928

Then we construct the bonds schedule as follows:

procceds 472,088

face value 500,000

discount on bonds payable -27,912

bond rate 0.05

market rate 0.06

ionterest expense: carrying value times market rate:

472,088 x 0.06 = 28,325.29

cash outlay 25,000

amortization 3,325.29

carrying value after first payment:

472,088 + 3,325.29 = 475,413.29

and the process repeat for all periods.

3 0

3 years ago

Jeff deposits $3,000 into an account which pays 5 percent interest, compounded annually. At the same time, Kurt deposits $3,000

VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:

Kurt will have a smaller account value than Jeff will

Explanation:

The formula for calculating future value = A (B / r)

B = [(1 + r)^n] - 1

Jeff : $3000 x [(1.05^3 - 1 ) / 0.05] = $9457.50

Kurt :$3000 x [(1.03^3 - 1 ) / 0.03] = $9272.70

Jeff would have a higher account value than Kurt

8 0

3 years ago

Kamath-Meier Corporation's CFO uses this equation, which was developed by regressing inventories on sales over the past 5 years,

charle [14.2K]

Answer:

$71.5

Explanation:

Inventory forecast is a way of predicting the volume of inventory required to fulfill future orders based on the existing production capacity and other plans relating to production

equation for forecasting inventory = $22 + 0.125 sales

Current sales = $300 million

Annual sales growth rate =32%

sales for next year = 300 + (300*32%)

300 + 96= $396 million

Applying the equation

Inventory = $22 + (0.125*396)

$22 + $49.5 = $71.5 million

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose two cities are considering tearing down their stadiums to build new ones. In one city, the old stadium cost $5 million t

timofeeve [1]

Answer:

These are the options for the question:

A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.

B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.

C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.

And this is the correct answer:

A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.

Explanation:

City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers