Option C, Transactional leaders do not focus on worker input regarding assigned goals.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Transactional leadership is an essential component of the Full Range Leadership model and a leadership style focussed on oversight, organization, and performance.
A number of senior military personnel, CEOs of large global companies and NFL trainers are regarded as transactional leaders. Transactional management also works efficiently in police agencies and first responders.
Transactional leaders use rewards and penalties to get their followers to respect them. Furthermore, transaction leaders don't care in relation to transition management for the welfare of workers they are foreign motivators that give the followers’ minimal adherence.
Examples of few transactional leaders: Vince Lombardi, Bill Gates and Howard Schultz.
Answer:
Investment worth now = 3,726 dollars
Explanation:
This is simple question which can easily be understood with the help of following calculations.
Initial Investment = $ 3000 -A
Value increase by 20% = A*1.2 = 3600-B
Value dip by 10% = B*0.9 = 3240-C
Value increase by 15%= C*1.15 = 3726
In this way by applying rate to last determine value we can get current investment worth.
The correct answer for this is C. Jeb should scan the article to check if the one he's looking for is in there. This way, you can efficiently use your time and lessen your hassle on reading everything what the article has to say.
Answer:
moral hazard
Explanation:
Banks reduce the risk of moral hazard when they monitor and supervise how their clients are using the loans and credits made to them.
Some types of credits do not require any type of monitoring or control, e.g. a credit card which a client can use basically however he/she wants to. But other types of credit that are taken for purchasing assets, e.g. a mortgage, must be used by the bank's client to specifically carryout the intended activity.
In economics, moral hazard refers to the tendency that an economic party can engage in unusually risky activities because the capital (money) that they are investing is not theirs and the negative effects of a potential loss will be suffered most by other parties.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
This scenario best illustrates forward integration.
This is a case of forward integration because BlockWood Inc., which was facing similar difficulties with other buyers too, eventually stopped supplying raw materials and took to manufacturing furniture instead. SO they decided to fabricate their own furniture.
Companies make this decision as a process of vertical integration to expand and grow their business. In this case to produce and control their own products, eliminating the retailer that had decided to pay less money for the raw materials.
So now, Blockwood Inc. has the challenge to design and sell the products it is fabricating.
