1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iris [78.8K]
3 years ago
15

How did the great compromise resolve the conflict between states with large populations and states with small populations?

History
1 answer:
mario62 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:  The Great Compromise resolved the dispute of representation of the states (large and small) by creating a bicameral legislature.

Explanation/detail:

The Great Compromise was a measure decided during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

You might be interested in
Please never cheat on tests
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Duly noted

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
11. Under the emperor Constantine the Great, when was the new Hippodrome<br> constructed? *
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

Constructed in 203, during the reign of the emperor Septimius Severus, and expanded after 324 by Constantine the Great, it was about 130 meters wide and 450 meters long. The hippodrome could accommodate about 40,000-50,000 people.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Choose all of the events that relate to the U.S.'s involvement in World War I.
Ratling [72]

Answer:

B)

a plot by Germany to have Mexico invade the United States

D)

the assassination of the Austrian Archduke caused the U.S. to enter the war

Explanation:

Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and his wife, Sophie, were assassinated by a Bosnian Serb nationalist in Sarajevo in June 28 1914. This caused a war between Austria- Hungary and Serbia a month later. Germany sided with Russia and other countries like France, Belgium, Russia sided with Serbia.

The U.S remained neutral. In 1915, a German submarine sank a British ship and about 128 Americans lost their lives. In March 1916, a German U-boat attacked a French passenger ship which led to the death of many Americans. The U.S. wanted to cut ties with Germany but the Germans promised to warn before attacking passenger ships. The German did not keep to their agreement but continued to sink more passenger ships.

In 1917, the British deciphered a message from German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann to the German minister to Mexico, Heinrich von Eckhart proposing an alliance between Mexico and Germans. The message stated that the Germans would support the Mexicans in regaining the territory that was lost in the Mexican-American War. This lead to the U.S declaration of war against Germany.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think that the Patriots would have won the war without help from France and Spain? Why or why not?
valentinak56 [21]
<span>No-- France and Spain offered money, weapons, naval support, and military training.

Though the Patriots had an ideology to fight for and would have continued fighting the cause even with loss, the win comes from strong European support. France was an important ally providing naval support and official military training which the Continental Army needed. France and Spain also continued to trade with the colonies keeping their economy afloat during the war. </span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
More than anything, "Perseus" shares with readers the inner struggle of a hero who finds that he is perhaps more like his bloodt
vodka [1.7K]

Answer and Explanation:

1. The poem has a raviso tone. This allows the reader to understand that the act of killing takes away the heroism of an individual. That's because Perseus is a hero and is angry after killing Medusa, wanting to kill more people. However, his heroic nature shows that this feeling is wrong and that is why he gets angry, transmitting that irritation to the tone of the poem.

2. The choice of phrases and words for how Perseus was committed to his mission to destroy a dangerous monster, but later his thoughts proved to be conflicting and more accelerated, as this responsibility went up to his head and showed that he had the power to kill , just like Medusa. An example of this conflict, can be seen with the use of oxymoron "serpents torpidly astir."

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pope Leo the third Crowned Charlemagne in return
    11·1 answer
  • What did Lenin suggest the Communist Party do to Stalin?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes a way that the U.S. government protects its citizens from financial ruin?The government us
    5·2 answers
  • Why good citizenship is important and also what can happen is peopl do not have good citizenship
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a long-term result of the Black Death in medieval Europe?
    5·2 answers
  • ANSWER PLZ?
    15·1 answer
  • Light is kinetic energy that is transferred by ______ in the form of _____.​
    8·1 answer
  • A. Describe the climate of Ancient Mesopotamia?
    13·1 answer
  • Different types of jobs in early settlements separated groups into __________.
    13·1 answer
  • Who know this guy his legend in philipines​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!