Answer:
Jun's pressure and influence has invalidated Mika's consent.
Explanation:
By threatening Mika with prosecution if she doesn't set a discount for the sale of her house on the grounds of her debt to her, she has influenced Jun's consent or rather coerced it and therefore Mika's consent is invalidated in the agreement. Consent is free under law if contract and should be given under undue influence, duress or any other vitiating factor that will render the contract null and void such as the example above
In business this would be referred to generally as a liability (money that is owed).
This deal will be fully discharged when Leony pays Kali the $3000 for the car and Kali hands over her car to Leony so that Kali has the money and Leony has the car which means the transaction has been successfully completed.
Answer: verifiable
Explanation:
A financial information is verifiable when the independent measurers get similar results when using the same accounting measurement methods.
In this scenario, the independent measures use thesame method but do their work separately without them knowing the results gotten by the other person. When there's similarity in the results, it shows that the results are verifiable.
