Answer:1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
gradient equals

=
=
=
Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
When you plug in -6 for x, and 6 for y, like this 5 (-6) + 12 (6) = -15, it does not equal -15, but 42.
If the roots to such a polynomial are 2 and

, then we can write it as

courtesy of the fundamental theorem of algebra. Now expanding yields

which would be the correct answer, but clearly this option is not listed. Which is silly, because none of the offered solutions are *the* polynomial of lowest degree and leading coefficient 1.
So this makes me think you're expected to increase the multiplicity of one of the given roots, or you're expected to pull another root out of thin air. Judging by the choices, I think it's the latter, and that you're somehow supposed to know to use

as a root. In this case, that would make our polynomial

so that the answer is (probably) the third choice.
Whoever originally wrote this question should reevaluate their word choice...
Answer:
According with the graph:
1.) The equation of the regresion line is: y=5,720.10391 x + 957.225810
2.) The values of the correlation coefficient is 0.86
Step-by-step explanation:
In the graph is shown:
1.) Line of Best Fit
y=5720.10391 x + 957.225810
2.) Correlation
.86
Answer:
y=-2x+2
Step-by-step explanation:
the slope intercept form is y=mx+b
slope - to find the slope from 2 point you do (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) so it would be
(14-2)/(-6-0). which out simplify to -2.
y-intercept - the y-intercept is given in one of the points (0,2).