Answer:
- <em>As explained below, given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 fraction of the best applicants, </em><u><em>he can count on getting one of the jobs.</em></u>
<em></em>
Explanation:
The hint is to use <em>Chebyshev’s Theorem.</em>
Chebyshev’s Theorem applies to any data set, even if it is not bell-shaped.
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean.
For this sample you have:
- mean: 60
- standard deviation: 6
- score: 84
The number of standard deviations that 84 is from the mean is:
- k = (score - mean) / standar deviation
- k = (84 - 60) / 6 = 24 / 6 = 4
Thus, the score of the person is 4 standard deviations above the mean.
How good is that?
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean. For k = 4, that is:
- 1 - 1/4² = 1 - 1/16 = 0.9375
- That means that half of 1 - 0.9375 are above k = 4: 0.03125
- Then, 1 - 0.03125 are below k = 4: 0.96875
Since there are 70 positions and 1,000 aplicants, 70/1,000 = 0.07. The compnay should select the best 0.07 of the applicants.
Given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 upper fraction of the applicants, this person can count of geting one of the jobs.
Answer: Yes I do.
Explanation:
The 1950s were a time of great fear to people in the developed world. They feared that as the Cold War was just beginning, there were being watched by foreign powers and that they couldn't trust a lot of people because they didn't know who was who. Especially in America where the fear of Communism gripped the nation. They did not know if certain adverts were Communist Propaganda and they feared that sometimes the information government's had about them was used to Target them.
This fear is still quite evident today. Take the 2016 Election rumours for instance. Certain Social media platforms claimed that foreign powers used their sites to advertise the President and get him elected. The ease by which this was accepted showed that people do indeed still have fear advertising.
Answer:
See answers below
Explanation:
a. Direct materials & supplies $40,000 = $40,000 × 110%
= $44,000 × 20,000/25,000
= $35,200
Employee costs = $2,900,000 × 105%
= $3,045,000 × 20,000/25,000
= $2,346,000
Variable overhead = $600,000 × 100%
= $600,000 × 20,000/25000
= $480,000
Fixed overhead = $700,000 × 105%
= $735,000
b. Total costs per unit year 2 =
$3,596,000 / 20,000
= $179.81
Answer:
In our present American free enterprise economic system:
Some people want to see pure capitalism being put in place. This means that there is no government interference with the workings of the economy. Some others, including the government, have understood that there is no perfect capitalism. As such, they call for government intervention to ensure that economic crises are not allowed free reign.
Adam Smith, as a philosopher, vehemently advocated for a free market economy without any form of government interference. He did not even support the imposition of taxes by the government. John Maynard Keynes also supported a free market economy, but he advocated for some government intervention from time to time. John Keynes stated that government must intervene during economic crises through subsidies.
Explanation:
Adam Smith elevated the economic theory of laissez-faire. He noted that the free markets needed only the invisible hand to regulate themselves by means of competition, supply and demand, and self-interest. John Keynes advocated for increased government expenditures and lowering of taxes as two important means to stimulate market demand and pull the global economy out of depression.
