When designing a building an architect consider following things;
<span>The site or place where the building is going to be constructed, second thing he considered is engineering, another thing he considered while designing is the needs of the user and the materials which are going to be used in constructing a building.</span>
Answer:
<u>Equipment:</u>
Dr. Cr.
Depreciation Expense $5,520
Accumulated Depreciation $5,520
<u>Land:</u>
Land never depreciates, so there is no adjusting entry for the Land purchased on year end.
Explanation:
Year end is not given in the data so, it is assumed the December 31 is the end of the year
Equipment
Depreciation for the year = ( Purchase price - Residual value ) / useful life
Depreciation for the year = ( $32,000 - $4,400 ) / 5 years
Depreciation for the year = $5,520
It is true that Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead.
<h3>What is
Opportunity costs ?</h3>
Opportunity costs can be described as the term that represent the potential benefits which individual, investor, misses out in the process of choosing one alternative over another.
Because opportunity costs are unseen can be easily overlooked, therefore, in this case, It is true that Opportunity costs at a manufacturing company are not part of manufacturing overhead.
Learn more on Opportunity costs at:
brainly.com/question/1549591
#SPJ1
Ending merchandise = beginning Merchandise + net purchases- cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold= beginning merchandise + purchases during the period- ending merchandise
Answer:
The answer to both a and b is in the explanation below
Explanation:
a) The increase in wage can either decrease or increase the hours worked. This is became an increase in wage has both substitution effect and income effect that work in different directions. Substitution effect An increase in wage increases the opportunity cost of leisure, thereby making the worker increase number of hours worked. Income effect The increase in wage also makers the worker richer, thereby making the worker decrease number of hours worked.
Since no information about worker's preferences is given, we do not Imow which effect will dominate the other effect and, therefore, we do not know what the net impact of the increase in wage will be.
b) The bonus will only have income effect. The bonus will make the workers richer, thereby making the worker decrease number of hours worked.
If in part a), the substitution effect and income effect are equal in magnitude, then there will be no change in the number of hours worked. The number of hours worked will remain the same at 2000 hours. Since the employer would be paying $5 extra on each hour worked, the cost to the employer of increase in wage would be $10,000 (=2000 x $5), which is the same as the bonus in part b).
