We square the residuals when using the least-squares line method to find the line of best fit because we believe that huge negative residuals (i.e., points well below the line) are just as harmful as large positive residuals (i.e., points that are high above the line).
<h3>What do you mean by Residuals?</h3>
We treat both positive and negative disparities equally by squaring the residual values. We cannot discover a single straight line that concurrently minimizes all residuals. The average (squared) residual value is instead minimized.
We might also take the absolute values of the residuals rather than squaring them. Positive disparities are viewed as just as harmful as negative ones under both strategies.
To know more about the Least-Squares Line method, visit:
brainly.com/question/14940432
#SPJ4
Answer:
B and D
Step-by-step explanation:
A is false as it would be 3.08 when rounded.
C is false as it is rounded to the tenth not hundredth.
Answer:
1.0769
Step-by-step explanation:
multiply 4x2 to get 8
move -52x over the equal sign to make it 52x
so we get something like this: 8 + 169 = 121 + 52x
also move 121 over the equal sign to make it -121
Like this: 8 + 169 - 121 = 52x
Now when you simply, you will get 56 = 52x
Divide both sides by 52
Final answer is 1.0769
Answer:
x = 15 or x = - 
Step-by-step explanation:
Cross- multiplying gives
(14x + 6)(17x + 5) = 9x(27x + 11) ( expanding factors )
238x² + 172x + 30 = 243x² + 99x
rearrange into standard form : ax² + bx + c = 0
5x² - 73x - 30 = 0 ← in standard form
consider the factors of the product 5 × - 30 = - 150 which sum to the coefficient of the x-term (- 73 )
the factors are - 75 and + 2
Use these factors to split the middle term
5x² - 75x + 2x - 30 = 0 ( factor by grouping )
5x(x - 15) + 2(x - 15) = 0 ← take out the factor (x - 15)
(x - 15)(5x + 2) = 0
equate each factor to zero and solve for x
x - 15 = 0 ⇒ x = 15
5x + 2 = 0 ⇒ x = -
